New Manila Bay City Of Pearl

hpa designs New Manila Bay City Of Pearl hpa 何設計 (Ho & Partners Architects) hpa 何設計 (Ho & Partners Architects) Subscribed47 Add to Share More 20,478 views 98 21 ShareEmbedEmail https://youtu.be/3SqNhUd4UWM Start at: 3:47 Published on Mar 26, 2017 #hpa #hpahk Belt and Road Project between China and Philippines New Manila Bay - City of Pearl It is a visionary new integrated CBD in the heart of Manila. A revolutionary self sustaining smart community beyond any international benchmarks today. Redefining the Pearl of the Orient! Category People & Blogs License Standard YouTube License SHOW LESS COMMENTS • 13 Oscar del Rosario Add a public comment... Top comments Ronald Olano Ronald Olano5 days ago Please make this possible Reply 3 Jorelle Jarabelo Jorelle Jarabelo4 days ago TANGINA NYO Reply 2 AshTV AshTV1 week ago This is awesome!!! Reply 2 Ben Villamon Ben Villamon5 days ago wow ganda.. sana wag harangin ng mga eviromentalist dahil sa reclamtion. Reply 1 Nollie Calising Nollie Calising5 days ago wow! have to share this in socmed so that everybody will know that this ambitious project is soon to grace Manila Bay... Reply 1 Bernardo Reyes Bernardo Reyes1 hour ago Nice concept, I hope they consider on this design, 1) sufficient potable water supply (always in the news Manila has water supply problem because of poor infra, 2) Effective wastewater treatment plant, water treatment before releasing to Manila bay or recycle it. Reply Nara arsa Nara arsa3 hours ago 20 year at least, if this going to happen Reply gemini paloma gemini paloma17 hours ago Woww ..amazing !!! ♡♡♡♡♡☆☆☆☆ Reply Eiber AD Eiber AD2 days ago whoaaahhh is this for real??? Reply Mxrk Garcia Mxrk Garcia2 days ago Looks nice but how much is that gonna cost? Reply Nono Nana Nono Nana1 day ago Mxrk Garcia This master planned city is consists of private firms domestic and local. Reply Katherine Lao Katherine Lao4 days ago Approved na ba to? Reply Antonio Bautista Antonio Bautista2 days ago Katherine Lao approved na ng city government of manila antay nalang approve ng presidente Reply Autoplay Up next SANGLEY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ANIMATION Laurence Punsalan 2,415 views 4:27 An Empowered Woman in AIM Global - Upline Tanya Sharing of Success Story Robinson Ortega Recommended for youNEW 35:31 AIM GLOBAL NDO for OFWS - New Distributors Orientation by JLIM March 17, 2017 Robinson Ortega Recommended for you 56:12 New Manila Bay City Of Pearl International City 2017(UPDATED) Yoo Seung Ho 1,544 viewsNEW 4:24 Dates Are The Healthiest Fruit And Are A Cure - It is very important to know Dates Benefits everyday culture Recommended for you 4:04 Okada Manila Soft Opening (Yi 4k Action Camera) louisjakeramos 343 viewsNEW 2:10 OPP for OFWS March 23, 2017 - AIM Global Business Presentation by Ms. Tanya Robinson Ortega Recommended for you 47:32 AIM Global Japan Training By sir John Asperin March 26, 2017 Robinson Ortega Recommended for you 55:30 Top10 Most beautiful chicken breeds - Brahma Leghorn Orloff Serama Vorwerk Wyandotte chickens, HUHN Robert Höck Recommended for you 16:23 5 Secrets To Look 10 Years Younger | Anti-Aging Tips | Slow Down Aging Process Real Men Real Style Recommended for you 8:43 Top SHOCKING Facts about The Philippines 2017 | Filipino Facts | REACTION!! 🔥 HugKnucklesTV 29,597 viewsNEW 12:36 New Manila Bay 2017 Francis De Castro 18,523 views 3:54 12,980 - AIM Global Marketing Plan Presentation OPP 2017 Robinson Ortega Recommended for you 26:25 Philippines, Manila: Destination Batanes--Off The Grid Jason Posnansky 438 viewsNEW 14:49 The Future City Masterplan of Mall of Asia Complex and Manila Bay Jessie Delmo 274,428 views 7:22 Study Medicine (≈MBBS) In Philippines - Everything You Need To Know FENCE EDUCATION ACADEMY MBBS /MD 12,072 views 46:08 San miguel Airport Proposal - Bizwatch Business and Leisure 6,775 views 3:23 Future Manila Bay City [Solar City] Jessie Delmo 12,296 views 3:54 REAKSYON SANGLEY POINT 061913 Ian Atanacio 17,610 views 10:03 Forest City In Malaysia?????!!! arxALEP ツ 17,545 views 2:56 SHOW MORE Language: English Content location: Philippines Restricted Mode: Off History Help About Press Copyright Creators Advertise Developers +YouTube Terms Privacy Policy & Safety Send feedback Test new features

Russia warns of serious consequences from U.S. strike in Syria Reuters By Michelle Nichols, Andrew Osborn and Tom Perry ReutersApril 8, 2017

Russia warns of serious consequences from U.S. strike in Syria Reuters By Michelle Nichols, Andrew Osborn and Tom Perry ReutersApril 8, 2017 Russia warns of serious consequences from U.S. strike in Syria More By Michelle Nichols, Andrew Osborn and Tom Perry UNITED NATIONS/MOSCOW/BEIRUT (Reuters) - Russia warned on Friday that U.S. cruise missile strikes on a Syrian air base could have "extremely serious" consequences, as President Donald Trump's first major foray into a foreign conflict opened up a rift between Moscow and Washington. The warships USS Porter and USS Ross in the Mediterranean Sea launched dozens of Tomahawk missiles at the Shayrat air base, which the Pentagon says was involved in a chemical weapons attack this week. It was Trump's biggest foreign policy decision since taking office in January and the kind of direct intervention in Syria's six-year-old civil war his predecessor Barack Obama avoided. The strikes were in reaction to what Washington says was a poison gas attack by the government of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad that killed at least 70 people in rebel-held territory. Syria denies it carried out the attack. They catapulted Washington into confrontation with Russia, which has advisers on the ground aiding its close ally Assad. "We strongly condemn the illegitimate actions by the U.S. The consequences of this for regional and international stability could be extremely serious,” Russia's deputy U.N. envoy, Vladimir Safronkov, told a meeting of the U.N. Security Council on Friday. Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev charged that the U.S. strikes were one step away from clashing with Russia's military. U.S. officials informed Russian forces ahead of the missile strikes and avoided hitting Russian personnel. [nL3N1HF2QX] Satellite imagery suggests the base houses Russian special forces and helicopters, part of the Kremlin's effort to help Assad fight Islamic State and other militant groups. [nL8N1HF0X8] Trump has frequently urged improved relations with Russia, strained under Obama over Syria, Ukraine and other issues, was hosting Chinese President Xi Jinping at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida on Thursday night when the attack occurred. Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin, in Florida with Trump, said on Friday the United States would announce additional sanctions on Syria in the near future but offered no specifics. Russia's Defense Ministry responded to the attack by calling in the U.S. military attache in Moscow to say that at midnight Moscow time (5 p.m. EDT) it would close down a communications line used to avoid accidental clashes between Russian and U.S. forces in Syria, Interfax new agency said. U.S. warplanes frequently attack Islamic State militants in Syria and come close to Russian forces. "PREPARED TO DO MORE" U.S. ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley said on Friday the Trump administration was ready to take further steps if needed. "We are prepared to do more, but we hope that will not be necessary," she told the U.N. Security Council. "The United States will not stand by when chemical weapons are used. It is in our vital national security interest to prevent the spread and use of chemical weapons." Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, who also was in Florida with Trump and is scheduled to go to Moscow next week, said he was disappointed but not surprised by the Russian reaction because it showed continued support for Assad. Iran, which supports Assad and has been criticized by Trump, condemned the strike, with President Hassan Rouhani saying it would bring "only destruction and danger to the region and the globe." U.S. officials called the intervention a "one-off" intended to deter future chemical weapons attacks and not an expansion of the U.S. role in the Syrian war. U.S. allies from Asia, Europe and the Middle East expressed support for the attack, if sometimes cautiously. [nL3N1HF2G2] The action is likely to be interpreted as a signal to Russia, and countries such as North Korea, China and Iran where Trump has faced foreign policy tests early in his presidency, of his willingness to use force. The United States is now likely to be more aggressive in pursuing intelligence about Syria's suspected chemical weapons programme. The Pentagon has also signalled interest in determining any Russian complicity. "At a minimum, the Russians failed to rein in the Syrian regime activity," a senior U.S. military official told reporters, speaking on condition of anonymity. The official also said the United States had been unable to determine if a Russian or Syrian aircraft bombed a hospital that was treating victims of the chemical attack. Russia joined the war on Assad's behalf in 2015, turning the momentum in his favour. Although Moscow supports opposing sides in the war between Assad and rebels, the United States and Russia say they share a single main enemy, Islamic State. Tillerson said the strike took out about 20 percent of the seventh wing of the Syrian air force and hit a fuelling facility. The base's runway was still in use. Assad's office said Syria would strike its enemies harder. Damascus and Moscow denied Syrian forces were behind the gas attack but Western countries dismissed their explanation that chemicals leaked from a rebel weapons depot after an air strike. The Syrian army said the U.S. attack killed six people and called it "blatant aggression" that made the United States a partner of "terrorist groups" including Islamic State. There was no independent confirmation of civilian casualties. U.S. lawmakers from both parties on Friday backed Trump's action but demanded he spell out a broader strategy for dealing with the conflict and consult with Congress on any further action. [nL1N1HF0MR] The U.N. Security Council had been negotiating a resolution, proposed by the United States, France and Britain on Tuesday, to condemn the gas attack and push the Syrian government to cooperate with international investigators. Russia said the text was unacceptable and diplomats said it was unlikely to be put to a vote. MOSCOW WANTS EXPLANATION Russia expects Tillerson to explain Washington's stance when he visits Moscow next week, Interfax news agency cited a Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman as saying. Washington has long backed rebels fighting Assad in a multi-sided civil war that has killed more than 400,000 people and driven half of Syrians from their homes since 2011. The United States has conducted air strikes against Islamic State, which controls territory in eastern and northern Syria, and a small number of U.S. troops are helping rebel militias. Asked whether the strikes set back any efforts to work with Russia to defeat Islamic State, sometimes known as ISIS, White House spokesman Sean Spicer said: "There can be a shared commitment to defeat ISIS and also agree that you can’t gas your own people.” Tuesday's attack was the first time since 2013 that Syria was accused of using sarin, a banned nerve agent it was meant to have given up under a Russian-brokered, U.N.-enforced deal that persuaded Obama to call off air strikes four years ago. Video depicted limp bodies and children choking while rescuers tried to wash off the poison gas. Russian state television blamed rebels and did not show footage of victims. The U.S. strikes cheered Assad's enemies, after months when Western powers appeared to grow increasingly resigned to his staying in power. But opposition figures said an isolated assault was far from the decisive intervention they seek. Neither the Trump administration nor its predecessor has laid out a policy aimed at ending the Syrian conflict. (Additional reporting by Phil Stewart, Idrees Ali, Roberta Rampton and Patricia Zengerle in Washington, Steve Holland in Florida, Roselle Chen in New York and Denis Pinchuk in Moscow; Writing by Alistair Bell and Bill Trott; Editing by James Dalgleish and Lisa Shumaker)